The Broken Record

At the world’s only remaining serious media outlet, the Spectator, Brendan O’Neill describes with customary vim the gratifying (for once!) phenomenon of revolting Frenchmen:

…this revolt is as much against [the] political orthodoxies [of the metropolitan left] as it is against Macron’s out-of-touch and monarchical style. Most strikingly this is a people’s rebellion against the onerous consequences of climate-change policy, against the politics of environmentalism and its tendency to punish the little people for daring to live relatively modern, fossil-fuelled lives. This is new. This is unprecedented. We are witnessing perhaps the first mass uprising against eco-elitism and we should welcome it with open arms to the broader populist revolt that has been sweeping Europe for a few years now.

Bring it on!  It is about time some serious opposition to the green madness started to gain some traction and while manning the barricades is awfully un-British, protest against this horrendously damaging political sickness of our times is long overdue.

The state broadcaster in the UK takes a different view:

Sir David said: “Right now, we are facing a man-made disaster of global scale. Our greatest threat in thousands of years. Climate change.  “If we don’t take action, the collapse of our civilisations and the extinction of much of the natural world is on the horizon.”

The man is so full of shit that is it amazing he can get on a plane, mind you, I suppose his first class seats are quite capacious.  And he knows a lot about gorillas.

It is hard to know where to start, suffice it to say, that there is next to no evidence that the world is warming, even less that it is due to mankind’s activities, and loads of evidence that economic growth enables mankind to cope better with whatever slight changes might happen; and that Attenborough’s preferred solution, that of halting economic growth and slaughtering most of the world’s population probably isn’t ideal.

And how typical it is of the loathed BBC, scientifically ignorant morally sclerotic metro left cultural marxist cesspit, that as the inevitable grassroots rebellion against climate lies lunacy gets going, it focusses on the demented ravings of this man, trotting out the same old lies like some demented parody of the famous image of His Master’s Voice.

I would say that it was high time he was put out to grass, but I am sure he would be the first to admit that if that happened his farts would poison the ozone layer (or something).  So it’s off to the knackers yard for him.

 

Decline And Fall

I was reading an excellent article (as usual) by Rod Liddle in the Speccy in which he descibes the outcome of a ladies cycle race in Canada or somewhere which was won by a self-declared “lady” with a beard and, as far as we can tell, bollocks.

Rod voices the question we are all asking:

this narcissistic idiot’s fragile sensibilities are totally indulged by the authorities, infuriating his female competitors and making a mockery of the sport. How did we get to this stage, where a shrill but microscopically tiny percentage of the population get to have things their way, to the detriment of everybody else?

Obviously like any sane person,  I agree with him 110%.

However, I can’t help thinking that the whole point about civilization is that it is unnatural. The most civilised societies in the world care for their weaker members, look after the environment, save dogs that are stuck on pallets floating down rivers and what have you.

Therefore in a sense all this LGTBDFRDHSLUYGSYTQWERTY crap is an inevitable consequence of deliberately going against nature taken to the nth degree, but who are we to decide which degree civilization should be taken to?

The whole open borders immigration schtuck, that which the Italians describe as “Buonismo” (roughly translated as “Virtue signalling become public policy”) is the same.

It is as though civilization had a built in sell-date, which we in the west are now approaching. What happens after that is not clear, but I’ve stock piled Johnny Walker, tinned food and ammo and intend to sit it out from my hill top fastness.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

There is a tale for our times in the miss-named Torygraph this morning… a shocking crime has been reported:

She gave her a bear hug and the defendant pushed her hips towards her with such force that the complainant could feel his penis,” said Miss Dangerfield.

Disgraceful!!

What you need to remember is that the “defendant” mentioned is a repeat sex offender and rapist who identifies as a woman and as a consequence has been remanded to a women’s jail, as you do.

One there this individual (notice the careful phrasing!) resumed these same activities with the female inmates.

Unsurprisingly.

However, it is quite clearly outragous that this put upon inmate refers to her agressor as a “he” despite the fact that that person (phrasing!) had self-identified as a woman.

How dare she!  There’ll be trouble.

As for the prison service responsible for this absurd situation which is obviously rotten from the justice minister downwards:

“We apologise sincerely”

Jesus fucking wept.

Dealing With Jihadis

It appears that the new DPP, replacing the apocalyptically awful Saunders, is a man who has form prosecuting Islamic terrorists – sounds good, doesn’t it?

Unfortunately his first pronouncements on the job seem to be something to the effect that the poor little lambs to settle back into civilian life, their interlude in jihadi training camps and Syria being imputable to no more than youthful naivité.

he said many Britons who have returned from Isil territory in Syria and Iraq are not being prosecuted and instead need to be reintegrated because they were simply naive…Mr Hill also courted controversy during his short tenure as terror law watchdog by meeting with the Islamist campaign group that praised the Islamic State executioner Jihadi John.

It seems to me that given that travelling overseas to fight for declared terrorist outfits is a crime under UK law, they should all be banged up for the maximum, with no parole and no remission, if nothing else, por encourager les autres.  I further suspect that 95% of the UK population agrees.

What is it with these cunts who cannot undersand this simple truth?

 

In other news, the Home secretary has “courted controversy” by agreeing to extradite some obnoxious bastards who are almost certainly of a multitude of disgusting crimes, including torture and murder, to the US for trial with the intriguing possibility that they may be sent to the chair.

Well sorry, but we disagree.  I don’t know what the Home Sec’s motives were but justice is likely well down the list.  Looking hard is more like like it as part of the preparation for a leadership bid and knowing what will go down well in the shires, seeing as that he is a muslim himself.

Personally he has gone down in my estimation by this move.  I personally object to the death penalty because I do not accept that the state should have the power of life or death over anybody.  These scum have the right to a fair trial and to languish in jail for the rest of their natural.

Furthermore, I don’t think there is any chance they will be executed because I assume they will be tried at Federal level and that precludes (as I understand it) the death penalty.  That is a state level issue.  It’s all about good optics for Javid.

But justice is too important to be decided by what looks good, so Javid, whom previously I’d rated as a strong contender has messed up (for me).

Finally, why should these bastards be tried in UK for USA.  They are neither British nor American, the crimes were committed in Syria.  They should be handed over to Bashar’s police for investigation and trial.  I have no doubt that the process will be thorough and that documents can be obtained assuring us that they will be treated will all due care and attention.

I seems from the article that they are being held in Syria.  Now that Trump is Bashar’s new best friend the problem seems to me to be very easily solved.

The March to One World Government, Part 94

It has been inceasingly obvious for years that the UN has become an embryonic world government.  UN “rapporteurs” (the fact that they use a French word to describe them says it all really) roam the civilized world rooting out institutional racism (in what are, objectively, the least racist societies in history) and appalling relative poverty amongst the widescreen owning benfit claiming underclasses.

They hold summits, conferences and conventions on “climate change”, flying there in their 1st class cabins (for the oiks) and private jets (for the real grand panjandrums) and lecturing us all about how filling our car should cost more or how our choice of foreign holiday is killing coral or something.

In many ways they represent the end point of Gramsci’s “March through the institutions” – they are to a fault impeccable cultural marxists, and they have positioned themselves to take over the world.

It could be argued that Britain’s likely failure to leave the EU as a result of May’s bungling (or possibly treachery) is actually irrelevant because we won’t be voting to leave the UN anytime soon, and the EU looks pretty democratic compared to the UN.

And unsurprisingly really in view of the above, the UN has now decreed that European societies should anyway no longer have the right to exist:

“during the presentation of the report on the management of migration processes… The UN, led by António Guterres, wants to manage and influence migration…Europe and the entire Western World must prepare for the flood of Africans…Currently, nearly 1,3 billion people live in Africa, and by the end of this century there will be 350% more, or 4,4 billion… It is obvious that the continent, whose inhabitants are not able to feed themselves, let alone achieve an adequate level of urbanization and industrialization, cannot cope with such a sharp demographic increase. The UN therefore came up with the idea of resettling Africans to Europe and highly developed countries on other continents…At the end of 2016, just after his election as UN Secretary General, António Guterres said: “We must convince Europeans that migration is inevitable and that multiethnic and multireligious societies create wealth”…the goal set…is to promote migration, give it a legal framework and manage it globally…The “Making Migration Work for All” report,  says in no uncertain terms that nation-states are to cease to exist. The document says that migration would be beneficial to everyone…

We are told time and again by the usual suspects – the BBC, politicians of all stripes, Big Charity – that the benefits of mass immigration are legion, that it is in any case inevitable and even necessary to liven up our aging demographics.  This is frequently reported alongside stories of violent crime and aggression committed disproportionately by people who wouldn’t be here if it was not for uncontrolled mass immigration.

We see a police force rechristened (or should that be renamed? wouldn’t want to offend anybody, would we, you can be locked up nowadays for offending the wrong kind of people) the “police service” turning a blind eye to mass rape of young girls by groups of perverts (of a certain religion) while simultaneously perverting the course of justice by withholding evidence from defence lawyers for other less favoured accused rapists, some of whose lives have been ruined as a consequence.

The reality of uncontrolled mass immigration to the West, is depressed wages and worse working conditions for our own indigenous poorer classes, and increased crime, violence and a general breakdown of trust.

Meanwhile in Italy we see hundreds of thousands of young fit looking black men spending their days drinking beer and riding around on bicycles (both beer and bicycles provided courtesy of the Italian tax payer).  The irony of being being lectured by smug Germans on their spendthrift ways while struggling to deal with a problem to a large extent created by German policy is not lost on the Italians.

The idea that the immigration seen to date is:

a) only the start, and

b) the solution to a problem rather than the problem itself

is a rather hard sell to these folk.

These same long suffering Italian taxpayers are footing the bill for security at this week’s meeting in Turin of the Bilderberg Group.  It is too easy to sound like a tinfoil hatted conspiracy theorist when talking about these globalist organisations which is probably why so many people who should know better make no attempt to hold them to account.  But it is clear that there is a whole nexus of people of influence, with vast resources at their disposal who have a clear agenda of globalisation.

The outcomes are increasingly clearly going to include:

  1. ever increasing migration and the subduing of governments and populations who try to resist that
  2. a continuous flow of lawmaking and sovereignty away from democratically elected governments to suprenational bodies, and the bullying of populations who protest

The unspeakable truth is that people want to live in countries ruled by white people – that is always the direction of flow.  But the trouble is that when they get there they try to make them more like the shitholes they left behind.

And the frightening truth, for anybody concerned about human civilization, is that the UN’s mission is to help them do that.

Welby Jumps The Shark

The Arch Bish of Cant (careful how you pronounce that) considers that the EU is humanity’s greatest achievement since the Roman Empire.

It is to him:

the greatest dream realised for human beings since the fall of the Western Roman Empire

This is a ridiculous intervention on several levels.

Primarily it is plainly quite stupid for a man in his position to make sweeping statements about matters of contemporary politics which are quite so remotely detached from spiritual considerations.  I don’t recall the noble bish being quite so loquacious on the subject of the Irish referendum abortion (sorry I got those words the wrong way around) where it could legitimately be argued that there is a fairly obvious moral aspect where guidance informed by God’s wisdom and infinite goodness might very well be appreciated.

On the other hand the Bish’s understanding of international commercial and treaty law and convention is probably even less than the abysmal standard set by members of cabinet, the HoL, the press and the BBC to name but some.

For this reason alone a period of silence on his part would be most welcome.

And then there is the mindbogglingly fatuous idiocy of his comment.  The last 200 years have seen the greatest increase in human well being in history.   Economic, religious and political freedom and democracy for all are paid at least lip service in virtually the entire world and in vast swathes of the world are, to a reasonable approximation, also real.

Diseases that in living memory killed millions of babies and other innocents are now treatable and in some cases have been wiped from the face of the earth.

The bish might argue that microbes are God’s creations as well but I don’t think that is what he meant.

People are happier, richer, healthier and live longer, more fulfilling lives than ever in history, thanks to these now widespread freedoms.

But all this counts for nothing compared to the sclerotic, anti democratic, freedom-killing monster that Brussles has become?

I have rarely heard anything more idiotic.

 

 

 

Dismal May In Death Spiral

After months of pathetic failure in her declared efforts to achieve a clean Brexit, whatever the hell that is, being supposedly stymied either by the intransigence of the beastlies of Brussels or the bloodymindedness of the unspeakables in the “Other Place” Mrs May’s political trajectory seems finally to have taken on the unmistakeable form of the death spiral.

It can only be a matter of time before somebody makes an amusing HoC comment comparing being on the receiving end of one of her speeches with being “savaged by a dead sheep”.

Hopeless bumbler Corbyn just scored a 6-love PMQs victory, making hay on May’s floundering Brexit “strategy” (we use the word advisedly).

My regular reader will of course be aware that we know the reason for this which is that May has no intention of taking us out of the EU having been well and truly knobbled by her Brussels minders, doubtless having been bribed with whatever the Belgian equivalent of Ermine might be combined with unsubtly worded threats about never being allowed back into France for a walking holiday.

On the plus side, it is possible just about to discern with a good old dose of wishful thinking that posibly just possibly some sort of compromise might yet emerge from all this regarding a possible EEA/EFTA approach.  The words EEA having been pretty well desaparacidos for the first two years after the great day, have recently been cropping up more regularly in the press and op/eds, and so it is perhaps a little less unlikely than it once seemed that that rather neat solution to the current difficulties might yet be landed upon as being the only possible way forward, which it is, and rather a good one too.

It is increasingly likely that the EU is going to lose more bits at some point before too long and the EEA would be a choice port of call for the likes of the Visegrads and Ireland (?) if or when that starts to happen, so being in there first will be undoubtedly a huge strategic advantage.

What is obvious is that May’s successive failures on Brexit, Badgers, Heathrow (which is an abysmal decision despite its seeming inevitability now)(to pick just a few recent ones) – she has no instinct for governing.

It was clear during her appalling stint as Home Sec where her authoritarianism masked her incompetence.  At number 10 her breathtaking incompetence has the whiphand, and it is not a pretty sight.

For god’s sake GO!

 

The Non-existent Irish Problem And May’s Treachery

The poor old Grauniad is not un-relieved crap and today for instance in the much maligned (and generally, rightly so) CiF section there is a thoughtful and robustly written contribution by Sean Walsh.

Essentially his point is that the whole so-called Irish border problem which is convulsing the UK cabinet and has been for weeks is so much hot air.  The IRA is not going to relight their nasty campaign of murder, intimidation and vandalism for the simple reason that the only reason they signed up to the Belfast agreement in the first place was that they were beaten militarily, mainly thanks to diligent and courageous police and intelligence work over many years.

In fact viewed from the lofy heights of Castello Italicus the whole imbroglio is very suggestive of the true facts on the ground.  The mechanism by which May was manouvred into number 10 by the EU Commission is not yet clear, but there is no doubt in my mind that she has been well and truly nobbled.  Her persistence with the insane proposal for a customs partnership is proof of that.  As is the complete failure to engage with reality, and propose an EEA/EFTA transition period.  In this scenario we would be out of the Customs Union, out of the EU, but with good access to the single market much as have Norway and Switzerland.  It is no coincidence that they are the richest nations in Europe.

The precise details would need to be ironed out such as EU migration and so on, but this would be a situation which any PM worth her salt could sell to back benchers and the electorate, rgardless of how they voted in 2016.  Damage to the economy would be minimised, and despite all the shit talked about fax diplomacy (which is simply a lie, as has been pointed out by Dr North on several million occasions) would be safely negated by the truth.

The current bollocks and counter bollocks arguments, so strongly reminiscent of arguing about how many angels can dance on a pin head,  serve only to make the whole issue seem impossible and can best be understood as a Continuity Project Fear (to continue with the IRA meme).  Orchestrated by Brussels, with the collaboration of senior members of the civil service.

My gut feeling is that the EEA/EFTA rabbit is straining to be pulled out of the hat but Brussels via Mrs May’s team won’t allow that.

And on the Irish border question the answer is simply do nothing.  We the UK won’t put up hard border posts.  If the Irish do under instructions from Brussels then that is their problem.  In other words stand our ground, turn the problem round.  And she won’t do that either.

It is clear to me that May is acting under instructions from Brussels.  It is quite possible that Cameron’s over-hasty departure after losing was prompted by having received curt instructions from Brussels to “Fix It Or Else” and as a reasonably honourable though dim individual he opted to leave it to someone else.

May’s conduct is explicable only by this theory.

 

 

Something Must Be Done

London famously has overtaken New York for murders.

The mayor, a nasty incompetent little man has decided, doubtless with the assistance of Mrs Dick (the name alone is a guarantee) the head of the metropolitan police, that given that the nationwide gun ban has been such a roaring success (…ahem) that a ban on kitchen knives will be even more successful!

From Zero Hedge:

This hyperbolic response by politicians who desperately need to be seen as doing something, comes in the wake of a growing number of stabbings since Britain outlawed guns altogether. While Britain can now boast, as Piers Morgan[*] famously did in his interview with Alex Jones, that they were only about 30 gun murders in Britain in the year prior, British politicians failed to notice that crime continues to happen, just through different means. It became clear when Britain’s crime stats were put up against those of gun toting New Yorkers.

*Cunt

At a time when the government are desperate to encourage people to cook at home and eat more veg it is obviously deeply ironic that they are at the same time looking to outlaw the essential iten required to do just that, the most useful tool ever invented.  But these cunts don’t do irony.

Shortly after London Mayor Sadiq Kahn’s city-wide ban on knives, The Express had reported that one of Scotland’s leading doctors has called for a ban on “killer” kitchen knives.

In a separate story, we read in the Mail that Rome fans, trying hard one assumes to ingratiate themselves with the local citizenry, have attacked liverpudlians with hammers and belts.

Are they now going to try and ban the second and third most useful inventions ever?

You read it here first!

Institutionalised Paranoia

Travelling on the New Jersey transit trains between Newark and New York this week one cannot help being struck by the number of posters advising the long suffering clientele that, “if it feels wrong it probably IS wrong” and exhorting them to say something (the same is available in the execrable Spanish of American officialdom).

No, that is simply not the case.  If it feels wrong, 99% of the time you are being a paranoid arse.  The chances are that if something is genuinely wrong it will be because officialdom has fucked up for the nth time; ignored warning signs, handed guns back to some sad loser, or welcomed home jihadists while deporting law abiding students or others.

It is clear by now to most people, that the government cannot protect us but have no compunction in making our lives a misery trying to convince us and failing miserably, that the opposite is the case.

Government action of one sort or another is at the root of 80% of the ills afflicting the human race.