As Expected, An Absolute Crock Of Merde

After months  of lies, equivocation, deception and betrayal the Prime Minister has finally unveiled the plan her Remoaner Elves have been hammering away at with their Brussels bum-chums all the time while the supposed Brexit secretary and all the rest have been indulging in their little game of charades, with their pathetic simulacrum of good old-fashioned biff-bash negotiation while the real work was going on in the murky, fetid underworld of Whitehall’s political sewers.

It has been obvious since Chequers that betrayal was in the air, but frankly now we are faced with it it is still hard to grasp the dreadful extent of Mrs May’s accomplishment.

On the one hand it has been the most shamefully incompetently handled nego-surrender of all time, which has led to a “deal” which in the vanishingly unlikely event it passes through Parliament, I can only imagine will be signed at Versailles where there is a special railway carriage kept for just such occasions.  AEP in the Telegraph has understandably compared it to Austria’s famous ultimatum to the Serbs in 1914, an irresistible parallel which had occurred to me as well.  At all events the behaviour of the EU is coming to resemble more and more the last days of that doomed empire.

Or possibly it has been the cunningest of cunning plans conjured up by Mrs May in her hitherto unsuspected guise as chess Grand Master, to eat up the time with useless activity, keep her remoaner civil service and the EU occupied digging diplomatic holes and filling them up again all the time working to a conclusion which is the only way a fractious parliament can possibly be united over Brexit, which is in appalled disgust at her pretend proposals, thus assuring a good clean Brexit and all the rest of that good stuff.

Can it really be?

No sentient being could possibly imagine that what she has cobbled together is really a good or acceptable deal.

Equally I find it hard to believe that this ex-failed home secretary would be capable of dreaming up let alone bring to a conclusion such a subtle plot.  Mind you on her side she has the descendents of the people who managed DOUBLE CROSS, so perhaps she has played a blinder?

Only time will tell.

Decline And Fall

I was reading an excellent article (as usual) by Rod Liddle in the Speccy in which he descibes the outcome of a ladies cycle race in Canada or somewhere which was won by a self-declared “lady” with a beard and, as far as we can tell, bollocks.

Rod voices the question we are all asking:

this narcissistic idiot’s fragile sensibilities are totally indulged by the authorities, infuriating his female competitors and making a mockery of the sport. How did we get to this stage, where a shrill but microscopically tiny percentage of the population get to have things their way, to the detriment of everybody else?

Obviously like any sane person,  I agree with him 110%.

However, I can’t help thinking that the whole point about civilization is that it is unnatural. The most civilised societies in the world care for their weaker members, look after the environment, save dogs that are stuck on pallets floating down rivers and what have you.

Therefore in a sense all this LGTBDFRDHSLUYGSYTQWERTY crap is an inevitable consequence of deliberately going against nature taken to the nth degree, but who are we to decide which degree civilization should be taken to?

The whole open borders immigration schtuck, that which the Italians describe as “Buonismo” (roughly translated as “Virtue signalling become public policy”) is the same.

It is as though civilization had a built in sell-date, which we in the west are now approaching. What happens after that is not clear, but I’ve stock piled Johnny Walker, tinned food and ammo and intend to sit it out from my hill top fastness.

Hearts Of Oak

So it would appear that some off duty sailors have been very naughty boys and have got drunk and got in a brawl.

Splendid news.

I’m afraid I was thinking after that embarrassing episode in the gulf of Iran back in 2007, that the Navy had gone the way of the Police, the BBC and most everything else the government touches ie. been taken over by leftard girly boys.

But no, it would seem that some at least of these fine chaps still have the stuff to do what sailors down the ages have done best.

Splice the mainbrace all round lads.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

There is a tale for our times in the miss-named Torygraph this morning… a shocking crime has been reported:

She gave her a bear hug and the defendant pushed her hips towards her with such force that the complainant could feel his penis,” said Miss Dangerfield.

Disgraceful!!

What you need to remember is that the “defendant” mentioned is a repeat sex offender and rapist who identifies as a woman and as a consequence has been remanded to a women’s jail, as you do.

One there this individual (notice the careful phrasing!) resumed these same activities with the female inmates.

Unsurprisingly.

However, it is quite clearly outragous that this put upon inmate refers to her agressor as a “he” despite the fact that that person (phrasing!) had self-identified as a woman.

How dare she!  There’ll be trouble.

As for the prison service responsible for this absurd situation which is obviously rotten from the justice minister downwards:

“We apologise sincerely”

Jesus fucking wept.

Dealing With Jihadis

It appears that the new DPP, replacing the apocalyptically awful Saunders, is a man who has form prosecuting Islamic terrorists – sounds good, doesn’t it?

Unfortunately his first pronouncements on the job seem to be something to the effect that the poor little lambs to settle back into civilian life, their interlude in jihadi training camps and Syria being imputable to no more than youthful naivité.

he said many Britons who have returned from Isil territory in Syria and Iraq are not being prosecuted and instead need to be reintegrated because they were simply naive…Mr Hill also courted controversy during his short tenure as terror law watchdog by meeting with the Islamist campaign group that praised the Islamic State executioner Jihadi John.

It seems to me that given that travelling overseas to fight for declared terrorist outfits is a crime under UK law, they should all be banged up for the maximum, with no parole and no remission, if nothing else, por encourager les autres.  I further suspect that 95% of the UK population agrees.

What is it with these cunts who cannot undersand this simple truth?

 

In other news, the Home secretary has “courted controversy” by agreeing to extradite some obnoxious bastards who are almost certainly of a multitude of disgusting crimes, including torture and murder, to the US for trial with the intriguing possibility that they may be sent to the chair.

Well sorry, but we disagree.  I don’t know what the Home Sec’s motives were but justice is likely well down the list.  Looking hard is more like like it as part of the preparation for a leadership bid and knowing what will go down well in the shires, seeing as that he is a muslim himself.

Personally he has gone down in my estimation by this move.  I personally object to the death penalty because I do not accept that the state should have the power of life or death over anybody.  These scum have the right to a fair trial and to languish in jail for the rest of their natural.

Furthermore, I don’t think there is any chance they will be executed because I assume they will be tried at Federal level and that precludes (as I understand it) the death penalty.  That is a state level issue.  It’s all about good optics for Javid.

But justice is too important to be decided by what looks good, so Javid, whom previously I’d rated as a strong contender has messed up (for me).

Finally, why should these bastards be tried in UK for USA.  They are neither British nor American, the crimes were committed in Syria.  They should be handed over to Bashar’s police for investigation and trial.  I have no doubt that the process will be thorough and that documents can be obtained assuring us that they will be treated will all due care and attention.

I seems from the article that they are being held in Syria.  Now that Trump is Bashar’s new best friend the problem seems to me to be very easily solved.

Celebrating 20th July

The Americans have July 4th.  The French have July 14th.

And not to be left out, the Germans have 20th July.  Not perhaps celebrated with quite such enthusiasm as the other two; but, desperate to bury the national shame of her recent past Germany celebrates the attempt by Colonel Claus Schenk Count von Stauffenberg to murder Hitler and take control of his hideous regime with his co-conspirators von Tresckow and others.

The legend that has been allowed to grow over the years is that these brave men, sickened by the attrocities committed against the Jews in Poland and Ukraine they have begun to learn about, are determined to do something about the monster who has taken control of their country and effectively enslaved its people, tragically the plot failed, Stauffenberg and others died heroes’ deaths and the war continued until the German people were liberated from the Nazis by the allies.

I read a brilliant and timely article in the Speccy this morning in which historian Matthew Olex-Szczytowski comprehensively debunks the myth.

Uncomfortable truths (the plotters were a tiny band, most had been Nazis or enthusiastic supporters) … discoveries which the archives are still yielding…show the full extent to which key players, such as Stauffenberg himself, were full-blown Nazi criminals before they ever came to oppose the regime…A reckoning with such facts will be tough. After all, the Ministry of Defence is in the Stauffenbergstrasse in Berlin, the army schools officers at its Stauffenberg barracks in Dresden, and the Bundeswehr runs global missions from the Tresckow base near Potsdam.

Furthermore:

For Stauffenberg and Tresckow, the charge sheets might have started in 1939 when, as senior military men invading Poland, they aided the SS Einsatzgruppen squads in murdering thousands. Stauffenberg’s division was implicated in burning 70 Poles and Jews alive in a barn; his people were there when the Germans staged a pogrom to ‘celebrate’ Yom Kippur; he welcomed ethnic cleansing and German colonisation. Tresckow was directly involved in atrocities too. During and after the fighting, 20,000 Poles and Jews were unlawfully put to death, but in the classic accounts Stauffenberg and Tresckow noticed nothing…From late 1940 to early 1943, Stauffenberg was a key aide to the head of the army’s high command, General Franz Halder. The future frondeur shaped the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. This saw the German army run mass executions, starve more than three million POWs to death and support the Einsatzgruppen in shooting 1.2 million Jews and 800,000 others. In 1942 Stauffenberg planned compulsory labour culminating in the induction of
3.6 million Soviet civilians — men, women and children — into slavery in Germany and Austria. Tresckow helped lead the Army Group Centre, the largest force to invade Soviet-run territory, so shared in myriad army crimes. We know his people murdered and helped the Einsatzgruppen to kill. By the end of 1941 he had presided over the death of a million Soviet prisoners left to starve and freeze.

Far from being disgusted by these crimes it is quite clear that the plotters in the general staff were steeped in blood to their elbows, and were motivated entirely by  the growing realization that Hitler’s increasingly demented and disastrous running of the war was leading to certain defeat and they aimed to replace what they saw as a failing regime with what they believed would be a more successful one, involving themselves enjoying the fruits of power.

… they concocted reactionary schemes which were either risible (for Germany’s internal governance) or ominous (for continued German rule over Europe)… Albert Speer might have been a minister, Tresckow would have run the police.

These facts have been known for some time and more is being unearthed all the time.  Olex-Szczytowski rightly asks why Germany is so reluctant to confront this truth?  And concludes that given the continued interest in this history in Germany and the activities of the revisionists will lead to a reckoning:

Only last month the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland party … caused uproar by pooh-poohing the impact of Hitler when seen against the country’s 1,000 years of achievement.

Quite what these 1000 years of achievement consists of I’m not so sure.  Germany didn’t exist as a unified state untl the 19th century when their single greatest statesman, Bismarck, merged a motley collection of independent duchies and principalities into a militaristic giant which fought a won a series of wars of conquest against its neighbours culminating in a shocking victory over France in 1870.

Germany’s most important contribution to human wellbeing was the invention of protestantism but even that only led to the enlightenment after it had transplanted to Great Britain.  Plus they had some very great writers and composers, as did other nations.

Germany’s military adventures in the 20th century are too tragic to mention save to say that we are all still living in the baleful afterglow of the conflagration.

And after the inevitable but agonising and costly defeat we have the economic miracle, funded largely by the Americans and by default on her debts.

A generally unknown fact pointed out by James Holland in his outstanding book “The War In The West” is that compared to the western allies (excluding the USA) at the start of the war Germany was very weak in terms of motorisation.  Even quite late in the war an awful lot of men and materiel were moving on foot or horsedrawn.  The excellent but overworked railway system could not make up for this.  The rather small British was far better equipped in terms of motor transport, this being the result of a conscious decision to replace men with machines as far as possible.

I think it is for this reason that the German motor industry is such an important thing for modern Germany.  The Germans are always fighting the last war.

All the important technical innovations  in the 20th century were made by the British or the Americans.  In the first there was the tank.  In the second there was overwhelming logistical dominance.   It seems that the understandable desire to win the peace has led to this enormous industry being the cornerstone of their economy.

But globally the economy has moved on.  Modern economies are not based on massive manufacturing plants.  However much Grauniad columnists and Labour Party MPs might deplore the fact, modern economies are mixed, flexible, and post-industrial.

In the last decade Germany’s astonishing dominance of the euroland economy has been based on control of a currency rigged in its favour, and at the expense of her southern neighbours.  She has built up a Target 2 imbalance of a trillion euros which she might as well write off now as it will never be repaid.

Viewed from the lofty heights of Castello Italicus it is clear that Germany, far from winning the peace has in fact hoist herself with her own petard and in fact the German people are in for a very serious economic reaming at some point in the next decade or so, when this whole mess collapses under the weight of its own internal contradictions.  A reckoning is coming and it won’t be pretty.

As for the Stauffenberg plot, had it succeeded, one monster would have been replaced by others and the war might have dragged on even longer.  Let’s celebrate the fact that they failed.

 

Never Play Chicken With The Village Idiot

Many moons ago on a drink fuelled cricket tour to Malta, one of the company came out with the pearl of wisdom which forms our title today.  It’s a miracle I can remember it!

Muttered sagely at strategic intervals, I like to think it conveys an attractive blend of worldliness, wisdom and humour.

The Brexit process is itself becoming a bit of a game of chicken, and the village idiot, unfortunately, in this case, is us; or rather Mrs May’s cabinet.

I rarely bother reading newspaper stories on the subject any more but just occasionally do just to keep vaguely abreast of what they are saying, however divorced that might be from reality.

Hence today’s story in the Mail in which we read that a certain Greg Clark (no, me neither) has incurred the wrath of the mis-named European Research Group (they don’t seem to have researched anything, except doubtless some agreeable watering holes around town) and is accused of inciting businesses who might be concerned about the consequences of the government’s abysmal handling of the situation, to make their fears known.

Given that the Government’s current course, if not changed, will lead to very substantial and wholly unnecessary damage to the economy and to the businesses concerned it seems to me he is acting quite reasonably.

It is beyond belief that people are still blathering on about Max Fac and Customs cooperation.  It has been obvious for months these are wholly spurious red herrings.

From where we are now the only sensible course of action is to apply to join EFTA/EEA for what should turn out to be the transition period.

The ignorant lunatics of the ERG and JRM wing of the tory party decry this as BRINO or a soft brexit, whereas in reality it is a perfectly sufficient Brexit which gets us moving in the right direction without bringing down the cataclysm of the original Project Fear upon us.

I suppose it is still possible that this is the result May is wobbling towards, much as I wobbled towards my hotel room after 8 pints of beer, 4 G&Ts and a bottle of wine at dinner in Malta.

But chicken is not a game without consequences.

The hangover after a no deal Brexit will require something stronger than an aspirin.

 

UPDATE 

This morning there is a similar story in the Telegraph, which would seem to have been written by Nick Timothy, architect of Mrs May’s disastrous election campaign, and serial idiot of the first water.

It looks as if the lunatic fringe is now panicking, desperately leaking and briefing their own version of project fear, presumably trying to head off any EEA-type solution.  Quite why they should want to is another question.

 

Aaaaaaaagggghhhh For Fuck’s Sake

The Telegraph is carrying a story which is is so symptomatic of the sad depths to which parts of the infantilised world of so-called Academe have fallen:

The University of Exeter’s careers service sent out an email which included a quote from Erwin Rommel, the World War Two Nazi general also known as the Desert Fox.

For any millenials who might be reading who have not heard of the second World War, they helpfully remind us that:

Rommel was one of the most senior members of the Nazi war machine.

Our curiosity is then sated as to the scandalous  contents of this quote :

“One cannot permit unique opportunities to slip by for the sake of trifles.”

Rather good actually and is genuinely good advice for people who like poor old Rommel are struggling to achieve miracles whilst held back by a severely hidebound bureaucracy and a certifiably mental leader.

The usual pathetic, craven apology naturally follows:

A spokesman from the Exeter University said: “This was a genuine error and in no way intentional, however we apologise unreservedly for any offence it may have caused, and have put additional processes in place to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”

The implication is therefore that any sentence that might have been used by a Wehrmacht General is therefore Verboten.  If his little aphorism had made some disgusting remark about gassing Jews or starving Kulaks their position would be entirely understandable.  But that is not the case here.  This might have been taken from any book on achieving success in any field of life.

The next quote given on the site whence this would seem to have been lifted is this:

War makes extremely heavy demands on the soldier’s strength and nerves. For this reason, make heavy demands on your men in peacetime exercises

In other words, “Train hard fight easy” – might have been written by the Royal MArine Commandos…

The one before is not bad as well:

The art of concentrating strength at one point, forcing a breakthrough, rolling up and securing the flanks on either side, and then penetrating like lightning deep into his rear, before the enemy has time to react

simply describing the principle of the “Schwerpunkt”.  And nothing but good tactical sense.

On tactics he was pretty sound, on strategy perhaps less so (why did he waste precious time and fuel occupying a huge empty stretch of desert which just left his supply lines hopelessly extended for no material gain?).

Here’s a good one “Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics” – if Rommel said that then presumably I have to apologise and take my website down, but fortunately it seems to have originated at West Point so that’s all right!

How fucking absurd is that?

And then, dulcis in fondo, (jesus, who said that? if it was Caesar is that ok?  I mean he murdered two million Gauls but perhaps that’s ok because he wasn’t a Nazi, but he was surely right wing so he must have been a bad guy, right? – oh My Golly I’m so confused) we get the true measure of Exeter Uni Careers’ Service:

The spokesman said the University of Exeter staff member who selected the quote did not know who Rommel was, and the information was taken from a free-to-use website.

This is a fucking University, for fucks’ sake, and their researcher has never heard of Rommel?  Christ on a fucking bike.  I mean, REALLY?

The March to One World Government, Part 94

It has been inceasingly obvious for years that the UN has become an embryonic world government.  UN “rapporteurs” (the fact that they use a French word to describe them says it all really) roam the civilized world rooting out institutional racism (in what are, objectively, the least racist societies in history) and appalling relative poverty amongst the widescreen owning benfit claiming underclasses.

They hold summits, conferences and conventions on “climate change”, flying there in their 1st class cabins (for the oiks) and private jets (for the real grand panjandrums) and lecturing us all about how filling our car should cost more or how our choice of foreign holiday is killing coral or something.

In many ways they represent the end point of Gramsci’s “March through the institutions” – they are to a fault impeccable cultural marxists, and they have positioned themselves to take over the world.

It could be argued that Britain’s likely failure to leave the EU as a result of May’s bungling (or possibly treachery) is actually irrelevant because we won’t be voting to leave the UN anytime soon, and the EU looks pretty democratic compared to the UN.

And unsurprisingly really in view of the above, the UN has now decreed that European societies should anyway no longer have the right to exist:

“during the presentation of the report on the management of migration processes… The UN, led by António Guterres, wants to manage and influence migration…Europe and the entire Western World must prepare for the flood of Africans…Currently, nearly 1,3 billion people live in Africa, and by the end of this century there will be 350% more, or 4,4 billion… It is obvious that the continent, whose inhabitants are not able to feed themselves, let alone achieve an adequate level of urbanization and industrialization, cannot cope with such a sharp demographic increase. The UN therefore came up with the idea of resettling Africans to Europe and highly developed countries on other continents…At the end of 2016, just after his election as UN Secretary General, António Guterres said: “We must convince Europeans that migration is inevitable and that multiethnic and multireligious societies create wealth”…the goal set…is to promote migration, give it a legal framework and manage it globally…The “Making Migration Work for All” report,  says in no uncertain terms that nation-states are to cease to exist. The document says that migration would be beneficial to everyone…

We are told time and again by the usual suspects – the BBC, politicians of all stripes, Big Charity – that the benefits of mass immigration are legion, that it is in any case inevitable and even necessary to liven up our aging demographics.  This is frequently reported alongside stories of violent crime and aggression committed disproportionately by people who wouldn’t be here if it was not for uncontrolled mass immigration.

We see a police force rechristened (or should that be renamed? wouldn’t want to offend anybody, would we, you can be locked up nowadays for offending the wrong kind of people) the “police service” turning a blind eye to mass rape of young girls by groups of perverts (of a certain religion) while simultaneously perverting the course of justice by withholding evidence from defence lawyers for other less favoured accused rapists, some of whose lives have been ruined as a consequence.

The reality of uncontrolled mass immigration to the West, is depressed wages and worse working conditions for our own indigenous poorer classes, and increased crime, violence and a general breakdown of trust.

Meanwhile in Italy we see hundreds of thousands of young fit looking black men spending their days drinking beer and riding around on bicycles (both beer and bicycles provided courtesy of the Italian tax payer).  The irony of being being lectured by smug Germans on their spendthrift ways while struggling to deal with a problem to a large extent created by German policy is not lost on the Italians.

The idea that the immigration seen to date is:

a) only the start, and

b) the solution to a problem rather than the problem itself

is a rather hard sell to these folk.

These same long suffering Italian taxpayers are footing the bill for security at this week’s meeting in Turin of the Bilderberg Group.  It is too easy to sound like a tinfoil hatted conspiracy theorist when talking about these globalist organisations which is probably why so many people who should know better make no attempt to hold them to account.  But it is clear that there is a whole nexus of people of influence, with vast resources at their disposal who have a clear agenda of globalisation.

The outcomes are increasingly clearly going to include:

  1. ever increasing migration and the subduing of governments and populations who try to resist that
  2. a continuous flow of lawmaking and sovereignty away from democratically elected governments to suprenational bodies, and the bullying of populations who protest

The unspeakable truth is that people want to live in countries ruled by white people – that is always the direction of flow.  But the trouble is that when they get there they try to make them more like the shitholes they left behind.

And the frightening truth, for anybody concerned about human civilization, is that the UN’s mission is to help them do that.

Welby Jumps The Shark

The Arch Bish of Cant (careful how you pronounce that) considers that the EU is humanity’s greatest achievement since the Roman Empire.

It is to him:

the greatest dream realised for human beings since the fall of the Western Roman Empire

This is a ridiculous intervention on several levels.

Primarily it is plainly quite stupid for a man in his position to make sweeping statements about matters of contemporary politics which are quite so remotely detached from spiritual considerations.  I don’t recall the noble bish being quite so loquacious on the subject of the Irish referendum abortion (sorry I got those words the wrong way around) where it could legitimately be argued that there is a fairly obvious moral aspect where guidance informed by God’s wisdom and infinite goodness might very well be appreciated.

On the other hand the Bish’s understanding of international commercial and treaty law and convention is probably even less than the abysmal standard set by members of cabinet, the HoL, the press and the BBC to name but some.

For this reason alone a period of silence on his part would be most welcome.

And then there is the mindbogglingly fatuous idiocy of his comment.  The last 200 years have seen the greatest increase in human well being in history.   Economic, religious and political freedom and democracy for all are paid at least lip service in virtually the entire world and in vast swathes of the world are, to a reasonable approximation, also real.

Diseases that in living memory killed millions of babies and other innocents are now treatable and in some cases have been wiped from the face of the earth.

The bish might argue that microbes are God’s creations as well but I don’t think that is what he meant.

People are happier, richer, healthier and live longer, more fulfilling lives than ever in history, thanks to these now widespread freedoms.

But all this counts for nothing compared to the sclerotic, anti democratic, freedom-killing monster that Brussles has become?

I have rarely heard anything more idiotic.